10 Megyn Kelly Takedowns of Meghan Markle

1. Megyn Kelly's Time 100 Dilemma

Timestamp: 00:00:05 to 00:01:49 - watch this moment on skim

Megyn Kelly discusses her reservations about attending the Time 100 event, questioning its validity and her own inclusion, while also considering the potential for a viral photo with Blake Lively and Meghan Markle. She expresses a desire for a red carpet moment as a comeback statement.

Significance (Medium): This point highlights Kelly's personal motivations and her critical view of the Time 100 list, setting a tone of skepticism towards public accolades and celebrity culture.

Sources in support: Megyn Kelly (Host)

Neutral sources: Glenn (Co-host/Commentator)

2. Meghan Markle's 'Founder, Innovator, Creator' Persona

Timestamp: 00:02:09 to 00:04:58 - watch this moment on skim

Megyn Kelly criticizes Meghan Markle's self-description as a 'founder, innovator, creator' in her Time magazine interview, viewing it as self-aggrandizing and out of touch, particularly when contrasted with her perceived lack of significant accomplishments. Kelly sarcastically notes Markle's emphasis on 'taking care of people' as her self-care.

Significance (High): This segment establishes Kelly's core criticism of Markle: an inflated sense of self-importance and a disconnect from reality, setting the stage for further 'takedowns'.

Sources in support: Megyn Kelly (Host)

Neutral sources: Time Magazine (Publication)

3. The 'Relatable' Cooking Show and Chrissy Teigen

Timestamp: 00:06:00 to 00:10:03 - watch this moment on skim

Kelly critiques Meghan Markle's cooking show 'With Love, Megan,' highlighting its perceived lack of authenticity, the excessive jewelry worn during a 'relatable' segment, and the controversial choice to feature Chrissy Teigen, another figure accused of bullying. The segment mocks Teigen's inability to recall her children's birthdays.

Significance (High): This point attacks Markle's attempts at relatability and her choice of associates, portraying her as out of touch and surrounded by equally problematic figures.

Sources in support: Megyn Kelly (Host)

Neutral sources: Glenn (Co-host/Commentator), Dr. John Kani (Actor, Friend of Nelson Mandela)

4. Meghan Markle's 'Bumpy' Pregnancy Video

Timestamp: 00:12:17 to 00:19:44 - watch this moment on skim

Megyn Kelly analyzes a video of Meghan Markle dancing while pregnant, suggesting it's problematic and potentially fake. She speculates that Markle may have used a surrogate, citing the 'bumpy' appearance of her belly in the video as evidence, and questions the appropriateness of sharing such intimate moments publicly.

Significance (High): This segment delves into deeply personal and speculative territory, questioning the legitimacy of Markle's pregnancies and framing her actions as attention-seeking and disrespectful to the sanctity of childbirth.

Sources in support: Megyn Kelly (Host)

Neutral sources: Glenn (Co-host/Commentator)

5. The Disputed Nelson Mandela Comparison

Timestamp: 00:20:00 to 00:24:03 - watch this moment on skim

Megyn Kelly reports that the Daily Mail investigated Meghan Markle's claim that a South African actor told her wedding was as celebrated as Nelson Mandela's release. The investigation found Dr. John Kani, the actor in question, denies ever meeting Markle or making such a statement, calling the comparison absurd and offensive.

Significance (High): This point directly challenges Markle's credibility by presenting evidence that a key anecdote she shared was fabricated, further solidifying the narrative of her being out of touch and dishonest.

Sources in support: Megyn Kelly (Host), Daily Mail (News Outlet), Dr. John Kani (Actor, Friend of Nelson Mandela)

Sources against: Meghan Markle (Duchess of Sussex)

Neutral sources: The Cut (Publication)

6. Meghan Markle's 'Authenticity' Under Scrutiny

Timestamp: 00:49:44 to 00:51:48 - watch this moment on skim

Megyn Kelly dissects Meghan Markle's interview with Emily Chang, arguing that her claims of being her 'authentic self' are undermined by her past adherence to royal protocols, such as wearing nude pantyhose, and her perceived inability to express her true thoughts for years.

Significance (High): This point challenges Meghan's narrative of authenticity, suggesting a calculated persona rather than genuine self-expression.

Sources in support: Megyn Kelly (Host)

Neutral sources: Daily Mail (News Outlet)

7. The 'Duchess of Sussex' Identity Crisis

Timestamp: 00:52:00 to 00:53:50 - watch this moment on skim

Kelly mocks Meghan Markle's statement about feeling 'least Duchess of Sussex' while eating a smash burger, interpreting it as an insult to her interviewer and a sign of her obsession with her royal title, suggesting she should have engaged with critics like Kelly instead.

Significance (High): This highlights the perceived disconnect between Meghan's public image and her actions, questioning her sincerity and relatability.

Sources in support: Megyn Kelly (Host)

8. Meghan's Missed Opportunity for Self-Deprecating Humor

Timestamp: 00:53:50 to 00:55:00 - watch this moment on skim

Kelly suggests Meghan Markle missed a crucial opportunity to appear more relatable by not engaging humorously with her critics, proposing that a collaboration with Kelly herself would have been a 'smart play' to showcase a sense of humor and down-to-earth nature.

Significance (Medium): This point frames Meghan's perceived lack of humor as a strategic failure, contributing to her negative public perception.

Sources in support: Megyn Kelly (Host)

9. The 'Glorification of Homemaking' Controversy

Timestamp: 00:54:15 to 00:56:28 - watch this moment on skim

Kelly critiques the idea that Meghan Markle's promotion of homemaking and domesticity on her show is controversial, sarcastically questioning the interviewer's premise and suggesting that Meghan's own lifestyle, including her staff and perceived lack of time for such activities, contradicts her message.

Significance (High): This point exposes a perceived hypocrisy in Meghan's public messaging regarding domestic life versus her actual circumstances.

Sources in support: Megyn Kelly (Host)

Neutral sources: Daily Mail (News Outlet)

10. The 'Rebel Royals' Documentary Analogy

Timestamp: 00:58:00 to 00:59:36 - watch this moment on skim

Kelly introduces a Netflix documentary about Princess Martha Louise of Norway falling for a gay shaman, drawing a parallel to Meghan Markle's story by suggesting it's a 'funny' version of the 'Harry and Meghan' narrative, highlighting the princess's embrace of her unconventional partner.

Significance (Low): This point uses a documentary comparison to subtly critique Meghan's choices by contrasting them with another royal who embraced an unconventional path.

Sources in support: Megyn Kelly (Host)

11. Meghan Markle's Alleged Pattern of Deception

Timestamp: 00:59:36 to 01:01:40 - watch this moment on skim

Kelly asserts that Meghan Markle consistently lies about her past, citing examples like the 'Finding Freedom' book contact, the 'racist' comment about the royal family, and the 'Deal or No Deal' objectification claims, arguing these falsehoods are part of a pattern to portray herself as a victim.

Significance (High): This point directly accuses Meghan of habitual dishonesty, framing her entire public persona as a fabrication designed for sympathy and attention.

Sources in support: Glenn (Co-host/Commentator)

12. The 'Deal or No Deal' Objectification Narrative

Timestamp: 01:01:40 to 01:03:52 - watch this moment on skim

Meghan Markle claims her time on 'Deal or No Deal' was exploitative, citing the pressure to look a certain way and being told to 'suck it in.' Kelly refutes this, arguing Markle knew exactly what the job entailed and enjoyed the attention, suggesting her current victim narrative is a fabrication.

Significance (High): This point challenges Meghan's narrative of exploitation, suggesting her claims are self-serving and designed to garner sympathy by reinterpreting past experiences.

Sources in support: Glenn (Co-host/Commentator)

Sources against: Megyn Kelly (Host)

13. Markle's Post-'Deal or No Deal' Career Choices

Timestamp: 01:06:04 to 01:07:00 - watch this moment on skim

Kelly questions Meghan Markle's decision to quit 'Deal or No Deal' due to alleged objectification, pointing out that she subsequently pursued roles in 'Suits' and posted semi-nude photos, suggesting her actions contradict her claims of being exploited and indicate a desire for attention.

Significance (High): This point uses Meghan's career choices to undermine her victim narrative, suggesting a pattern of seeking attention and fame through various means.

Sources in support: Megyn Kelly (Host)

14. The 'Victimhood' Strategy

Timestamp: 01:07:00 to 01:08:04 - watch this moment on skim

Kelly argues that Meghan Markle's core strategy is to portray herself as a victim, citing her claims against the royal family, Mariah Carey's alleged 'diva' comment, and the 'Deal or No Deal' experience as examples of reducing successful women to their lowest moments to claim sexism.

Significance (High): This point frames Meghan's entire public life as a calculated performance of victimhood, designed to elicit sympathy and promote a feminist agenda.

Sources in support: Megyn Kelly (Host)

15. Meghan's Social Climbing and Royal Rejection

Timestamp: 01:08:04 to 01:09:42 - watch this moment on skim

Kelly asserts that Meghan Markle, despite her privileged background, is a social climber who pursued wealthy British men for fame, was rejected, and then 'landed the motherlode' with Prince Harry, ultimately using the royal family for status before playing the victim.

Significance (High): This point paints Meghan as a manipulative opportunist who exploited the royal family for personal gain, dismissing her claims of racism or mistreatment.

Sources in support: Megyn Kelly (Host)

16. Public Opinion and Markle's Image Problem

Timestamp: 01:09:42 to 01:10:28 - watch this moment on skim

Kelly highlights polls showing declining approval for Meghan Markle in both America and Britain, suggesting that her 'obsessive image crafting' and victim narrative are failing, and that she needs to stop the 'nonsense' and do something meaningful to gain respect.

Significance (High): This point suggests that Meghan's public relations strategies are backfiring, leading to widespread disapproval and a need for a fundamental change in her approach.

Sources in support: Megyn Kelly (Host)

17. Homemade Popcorn as a 'Generous Gift'

Timestamp: 01:13:00 to 01:15:00 - watch this moment on skim

In a segment that appears to be a parody or a demonstration of 'relatability,' Moren (presumably a guest or co-host) makes microwave popcorn from scratch, presenting it as a thoughtful gift for a guest, implying that elaborate gestures are unnecessary and simple acts can be meaningful.

Significance (Low): This segment satirizes the idea of 'relatability' and 'generosity' by presenting a mundane task as a significant act, possibly mocking Meghan's own attempts at showcasing domesticity.

Sources in support: Megyn Kelly (Host)

18. Megyn Kelly: The Gift Basket Guru

Timestamp: 01:15:25 to 01:16:18 - watch this moment on skim

Megyn Kelly demonstrates an elaborate and enthusiastic approach to creating gift baskets, meticulously arranging various treats and using decorative ribbons. She emphasizes the personal touch and the joy of sharing these gifts with friends, viewing it as a 'love language'. This segment highlights her dedication to thoughtful presentation and the emotional significance she places on gift-giving as an expression of friendship.

Significance (Medium): This segment showcases Kelly's meticulous nature and her emphasis on personal connection through thoughtful gestures. It frames her as someone who invests significant effort into expressing affection and appreciation for her friends.

Sources in support: Megyn Kelly (Host)

19. The Essence of Friendship

Timestamp: 01:16:58 to 01:17:54 - watch this moment on skim

Megyn Kelly emphasizes that friendship is built on special time, bonding, and asking questions about each other, particularly when one person 'comes alive' when talking about themselves. She highlights the importance of friends and tokens of high esteem, such as pretzels, as symbols of deep appreciation. This underscores her view of friendship as an active, reciprocal, and deeply valued relationship.

Significance (Low): Kelly articulates a personal philosophy of friendship, emphasizing mutual engagement and appreciation. This segment reveals her values regarding interpersonal relationships and how she expresses care for her friends.

Sources in support: Megyn Kelly (Host)

20. Meghan Markle: The Marriage Mystery

Timestamp: 01:17:10 to 01:17:44 - watch this moment on skim

Megyn Kelly touches upon Meghan Markle's marriage, referencing her husband, D, and hinting at a disconnect between expectations and reality, particularly regarding a 'big castle'. Despite this, Kelly suggests that love and friendship are the most important elements, implying that Markle is making do with her current circumstances. This brief mention serves to highlight a perceived discrepancy in Markle's marital situation.

Significance (Medium): This point subtly probes into the personal life of Meghan Markle, suggesting potential dissatisfaction or unmet expectations within her marriage. It casts a shadow of doubt on the fairytale narrative, hinting at underlying complexities.

Sources in support: Megyn Kelly (Host)

Neutral sources: Glenn (Co-host/Commentator)

Host's Strong Negative Stance (High severity)

Type: Editorial

Megyn Kelly has a long-standing and intensely critical public stance against Meghan Markle, which frames the entire video's narrative and selection of 'takedowns'.

Significance: This pre-existing animosity raises significant questions about the objectivity of the analysis. The video functions more as a compilation of criticisms from a biased perspective rather than a balanced assessment, potentially misleading viewers about Meghan Markle's public perception.

Tabloid Source Reliance (Medium severity)

Type: Commercial

The video heavily relies on reporting and claims from tabloid sources like the Daily Mail and The Cut, which have their own commercial interests in generating sensational content.

Significance: The reliance on tabloid reporting for serious accusations, such as the 'surrogate' theory or the disputed Mandela comparison, compromises the credibility of the claims. Audiences may be consuming unverified or exaggerated information driven by the commercial need for clicks and controversy.

Megyn Kelly's Strong Anti-Meghan Stance (High severity)

Type: Editorial

Megyn Kelly has a well-documented and intensely critical public stance against Meghan Markle, consistently framing her actions and statements negatively. This ongoing animosity could compromise objective analysis.

Significance: The host's deep-seated bias against Meghan Markle means the entire video is framed through a lens of condemnation. Viewers must question whether the 'takedowns' are genuine critiques or a continuation of a personal vendetta, potentially distorting the presentation of facts.

Commentator's Negative Stance (High severity)

Type: Editorial

Megyn Kelly has a clear and consistent history of expressing highly critical and negative opinions about Meghan Markle, framing her as a subject of 'takedowns'.

Significance: This pre-existing animosity raises significant questions about the objectivity of any commentary provided by Megyn Kelly regarding Meghan Markle. The audience is left to wonder if the analysis is driven by genuine critique or a personal vendetta, potentially compromising the integrity of the information presented.